1. Call Transaction From Abap Program

I am developing in ABAP. I have a requirement to trigger a custom event in an ABAP Z-program. Can anyone pls tell me how can I call a custom event in a Z-program. Yes the Workflow can be triggered without the triggering events either by configuring it or by using the Function Module SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW You can also trigger Workflow when a Message is thro, Is it possible to start the workflow without triggering event., ABAP Tutorial. Pre-requisites: It is assumed that the reader of this document is aware of the business object concepts and good in ABAP. Procedure: In this document, we would take an example of the business object BUS1001006 (Material) and the event CREATED.

General Scenario where you can make use of: In General, we may come across the scenarios where, when actually a function item is usually developed, or carried out, we may need to upgrade the data source dining tables or we require to execute a different task in background or we may need to get the workflow container ideals and change them dynamically at run period and fixed the new ideals to the workflow container elements. In these sorts of instances we can use Program Exits in the workfIows.

A Considered Situation to explain the use of program exits: A ZWORKITEMINFO table with 7 fields. Field Data Element Explanation WIID SWWWIID Function item ID WITYPE SWWWITYPE Work item kind WICREATOR SWWOBJID Originator of work item WIRHTASK SWWTASK Job ID WIPRIO SWWPRIO Concern of work product WICD SWWCD Development time of function product WIEXECUTED CHAR1 Confirmation of setup Include a Decision phase in the workfIow whenever the respective work product is made an access is inserted in the table ZWORKITEMINFO. Once the function item can be executed from SBWP, field WIEXECUTED of the above table can be established to 'Times'. Understanding the Interface IFSWFIFSWORKITEMEXIT: IFSWFIFSWORKITEMEXIT is certainly a Runtime Departure Workflow Interface. If you look at the user interface it is made up of one method Occasion RAISED and qualities are usually of Regular kind belong to SWWEVTTYP Occasion Kind for Workflow Runtime.

This interface contains a type-gróup SWRCO which contains all the constant feature beliefs that are usually utilized in this user interface like SWRCOEVENTAFTERCREATE etc. The right after are usually the feasible predefined events that can occur with respect to a function product. Before Development.

After Development. Before Execution.

After Performance. After Performance of a Synchronous Item Method. Before Physical Deletion. After a Standing Transformation. After Principle Execution.

After an Action. Before an Motion As it provides been currently stated in the SAP assist records that, the courses are utilized in the Program Exits tab must support the user interface IFSWFIFSWORKITEMEXIT and this course must not have got any call tó the RFC functionality modules, or it must not consist of any statements like COMMITWORK, Move Back again etc. Understanding the ABAP Class that Facilitates IFSWFIFSWORKITEMEXIT Attributes of the ABAP class should be as proven in the screen chance and include the type group SWRCO. In the Interface tab include the interface IFSWFIFSWORITEMEXIT. After incorporating the interface look at the Characteristics tabs it will end up being like the below display screen. Here we need to specify two even more attributes along with the included qualities they should be Instance specific and personal and I possess declared WICONTEXT as kind ref to one even more user interface IFWAPIWORKITEMCONTEXT this user interface will provide you the current framework for the work product. PROCESSSTATUS will be another feature which define the title of the residence for semantic procedure status and initial worth must be designated as 'sáp.bc.bmt.wfm.procedure.position'.

Check the METHOD Tabs it will have one method integrated by default when you include the interface IFSWFIFSWORKITEMEXIT. Here I have got defined two more methods to deal with the predefined occasions of the function item. Now carry out the technique of the user interface EVENTRASIED.

Call Transaction From Abap Program

The minimal program code that is definitely needed to confirm the occasion title and which technique should behave as event handler. After delivery of the Occasion Raised technique the feature WICONTEXT will have got the present context (Present Status of the function product) of work item. we.elizabeth. The instance of the interface IFWAPIWORKITEMCONTEXT can be created.As soon as the example of the IFWAPIWORKITENCONTEXT is certainly created then by using its different strategies, we can obtain the info related to the workitem. The interface IFWAPIWORKITEMCONTEXT offers the using strategies by which we can retrieve the details that can be required about the function item.To find full list of strategies, implement SE24 get into the interface name and click on on the Strategies tab. Execution of AFETRCREATION ( ) technique In this method implementation notice the Contact METHOD declaration where it is certainly contacting getheader technique which belongs to the interface IFWAPIWORKITEMCONTEXT, which will return the header details of the workitem for more details about the header information open up the construction SWRWIHDR in SE11.

Execution of AFTEREXECUTION ( ) method. The same work item context is definitely utilized in the AFTEREXECUTION method to get the function item ID Notice the Contact METHOD declaration in the AFTEREXECUTION method. Design the workflow having a simple Decision step and in the program exits tab include the class ZCLPROGRAMEXITWORKFLOW Activate and execute the workflow. An entrance is made in the desk but the WIEXECUTED field will not have any worth. Now carry out the work product from thé SAP inbóx (SBWP). Now the WIEXECUTED field in the table will become up to date by Times.

Dear Mr Pavan Bhamidipati, It can be a very good write-up indeed. A large Thank you. As you pointed out in this write-up that ' System Out of your can become used to execute a individual job in background or we may need to get the workflow box ideals and adjust them dynamically at work period and established the fresh values to the workflow pot components.' Can you please give some even more illustrations if convenient? Furthermore I was brand-new to workflow and studying it, I will significantly value your help if you can supply some even more material (or web page link to them if they currently exist on web) on some other advance functions of SAP workflow/webflow. Kind respect, BKSinghal@hotmail.com.

Hi all, I authored two programs. Logic pro free download windows 10. Program 1 Record ztmprog1. Furniture: scarr. SELECTION-SCREEN Start OF Mass 001 WITH FRAME TITLE text message-001. SELECT-OPTIONS: carrid FOR scarr-carrid. SELECTION-SCREEN Finish OF Engine block 001.

CLASS program DEFINITION. General public SECTION. CLASS-METHODS major.

CLASS-METHODS initialization. Personal SECTION. CLASS program IMPLEMENTATION. METHOD initialization. Crystal clear: carrid.

Carrid = Worth #( reduced = 'LH' option = 'EQ' indication = 'I' ). APPEND cárrid TO carrid.

Plan=>initialization( ). Plan=>main( ). System 2 Statement ztmprog2. Call the method from System 1 (ztmprog1)program=>main( ).

'How is the syntax???? How cán i call the stationary method main from program ztmprog1? Therefore the expression 'Usually'. That doesn't imply that there aren't exclusions where it can make sense. Electricity lessons.:-) But bear in thoughts that over period, it might make feeling to draw out a group of associated static strategies, and refactor as a class modelling a particular item. You begin off with a static method that inspections for userid living.

After that you produce another that profits a usérid's validity. Aftér a while, it can make feeling to develop a class to design userids. And that's simply a component of maintaining your code base clean and efficient. Nevertheless, these extracted lessons should not really be complete of static methods. In the history, I've goné down that path, and after that when I've needed to specialize, I can't subclass - so I have to refactor, ánd retest. My encounter can be that if I make them example strategies to begin with, I conserve a lot of time and effort later on in the video game.

Just thinking about this once again from a póinty-haired-boss (DiIbert reference for those who put on't find out) stage of view. They experience threatened by any changes to present code. Therefore, I can kind of notice where the employer will not really allow changes to ZTMPROG1 above.

If you stick to the manager guy and proceed a copy to the common place, you have got two models of code. I have two suggestions for this. 1) Add a comment in big bold letters to ZTMPROG1 (I was sure the employer guy will permit comments, ideal?) that if any modifications need to be made to the strategies, start by aiming to the common code in thé ZMYCLASSTM. That wiIl end up being a good reason for deprecating thé non-common programs when adjustments are needed. Wear't make any real code adjustments to maintain the boss man content.

For ZTMPROG2, stage it to a typical course ZMYCLASSTM and perform it the correct method. This method when ZTMPROG3 comes along, you possess good common program code for that too. 2) Simpler solution - but harder to perform - open fire the pointy-hairéd-boss:). Thomas' course provides no class-constructor.

Contacting the main( ) technique directly yields a program framework where the CARRlD select-option is not initialized. OTOH starting the report via SUBMIT first triggers the INITIALIZATION event that clearly creates the initialization( ) technique, then executes the major( ) technique. Think about this difference in the program habits while analyzing alternatives.

An include can include one (or even more) regional lessons with their matching ABAP Unit test courses, so I think a dialogue on my offer to extract the course reasoning to an include should be about global against regional lessons (cf. Thomas' class offers no class-cónstructor. Yes, and l have always been suggesting that he perform modify the initialization tó a constructor therefore that the common initial code does not have to become explicitly called.

Beginning the record via SUBMIT You still haven't regarded if that is usually actually an choice - what if program1 adjustments system data that is definitely not desired at the second, or is usually component of a workfIow, or worse still transmits out a end user record or client facing record? Would you place in bank checks in program 1 to prevent that from happening?

About worldwide against regional lessons (cf. Public vs . published). The author is talking about program code possession and formalities around it, not really about the programming mechanisms.